Probatum vs Drata

Drata leads with “agentic” autonomous compliance and 8,000+ customers. Probatum leads with cryptographic proof and a desktop you can run today.

All claims sourced from Drata’s public website as of May 2026. We will update this page when their public positioning changes.

Side-by-side

The honest scorecard.

A dash (—) means the public page doesn’t commit either way. We don’t guess.

Capability	Drata	Probatum
Public, transparent pricing
Free trial without a demo call
Data stays on your machine
Cryptographic Verifiable Credentials (W3C VC)
Hash-chained, tamper-evident audit log
Open-source verifier CLI
Local LLM inference (no cloud egress)
Hallucination detection on every claim
Public list price	Not published	$299 / $799 / Quote
“Agentic AI” monitoring narrative
AI-governance framework depth (EU AI Act, ISO 42001)

Choose Drata when

You want continuous-monitoring integrations with your SaaS stack.
You’re comfortable with the agentic-AI framing and want the most autonomous workflow.
You prefer cloud-SaaS to local-first software.

Choose Probatum when

You want to verify before you buy — and the verifier is open source.
You won’t put sensitive evidence in someone else’s cloud.
Your auditor wants offline, math-grade verification, not “trust the agent.”
You need EU AI Act / NIST AI RMF / ISO 42001 evidence and Drata doesn’t cover them as deeply.

Drata’s pitch is “Agentic Trust” — autonomous agents that continuously monitor your security posture. Probatum’s pitch is that trust is a mathematical property, not an agent.

Frameworks Probatum covers